It’s one of those things that sneaks up on you, because if you don’t delve into this sort of thing, the absolute numbers of Facebook users are staggering, and the need for a huge, dedicated data center is not something that comes to mind.
But sure enough, the Facebook users are legion, and the data center that was planned, is being doubled in size before the construction began.
As large as other social networks are, it is no wonder that we are seeing ways to get into the social network are being put into everything from 3G cell phones to children’s toys (well, almost!).
Facebook has decided to double the size of its planned data center in Oregon before the first part of the project is even built, the latest sign of the company’s rapid growth.
Facebook said in January that it was building its first wholly owned data center in Prineville, Oregon, a 147,000-square-foot facility that’s due for completion early next year. It’s now decided to add another 160,000 square feet of data center space on the same site.
“To meet the needs of our growing business, we have decided to go ahead with the second phase of the project, which was an option we put in place when we broke ground earlier this year. The second phase should be finished by early 2012,” Tom Furlong, Facebook director of site operations, said on the company’s website Friday.
Facebook was approaching 400 million users when it announced the data center in January. Last month it crossed the 500 million mark.
Twitter said recently that it too will soon have its own data center. Like Facebook, its servers today are housed in data centers managed by other companies. Having its own facility will give Twitter more control over its infrastructure and, it hopes, reduce its outages.
Facebook said it employs 150 to 200 workers each day at the construction site. The data center itself will create 35 long-term jobs.
Greenpeace won’t be thrilled at the expansion plans. The environmental group has criticized Facebook for choosing a site where the local power company gets most of its electricity from coal-fired plants. Greenpeace says Facebook should have chosen a site near a source of renewable energy.
Facebook has countered that it picked Oregon because of its dry and temperate climate. That allows it to use a technique called evaporative cooling to keep its servers cool, instead of a heavy mechanical chiller. Facebook says the data center will be one of the most energy-efficient in the world.
The placement of the data center in Oregon may be just fine, but with the entire nation belonging to Facebook soon (imagine a census one day taken simply with an audit of Facebook) I would think that a centralized location might have been better – perhaps in Google, Kansas.